collapse Blogs I Read
collapse Table of Contents
  1. Mono and Mixed Mode Assembly Support - Jonathan Pryor's web log
    1. Mono and Mixed Mode Assembly Support

Mono and Mixed Mode Assembly Support - Jonathan Pryor's web log

« So you want to parse a command line... | Main | Announcing NDesk.Options 0.1.0 »

Mono and Mixed Mode Assembly Support

An occasional question on #mono@irc.gnome.org and ##csharp@irc.freenode.net is whether Mono will support mixed-mode assemblies, as generated by Microsoft's Managed Extensions for C++ compiler (Visual Studio 2001, 2003), and C++/CLI (Visual Studio 2005, 2008).

The answer is no, and mixed mode assemblies will likely never be supported.

Why?

First, what's a mixed mode assembly? A mixed mode assembly is an assembly that contains both managed (CIL) and unmanaged (machine language) code. Consequently, they are not portable to other CPU instruction sets, just like normal C and C++ programs and libraries.

Next, why use them? The primary purpose for mixed mode assemblies is as "glue", to e.g. use a C++ library class as a base class of a managed class. This allows the managed class to extend unmanaged methods, allowing the managed code to be polymorphic with respect to existing unmanaged functions. This is extremely useful in many contexts. However, as something like this involves extending a C++ class, it requires that the compiler know all about the C++ compiler ABI (name mangling, virtual function table generation and placement, exception behavior), and thus effectively requires native code. If the base class is within a separate .dll, this will also require that the mixed mode assembly list the native .dll as a dependency, so that the native library is also loaded when the assembly is loaded.

The other thing that mixed mode assemblies support is the ability to export new C functions so that other programs can LoadLibrary() the assembly and GetProcAddress the exported C function.

Both of these capabilities require that the shared library loader for the platform support Portable Executable (PE) files, as assemblies are PE files. If the shared library loader supports PE files, then the loader can ensure that when the assembly is loaded, all listed dependent libraries are also loaded (case 1), or that native apps will be able to load the assembly as if it were a native DLL and resolve DLL entry points against it.

This requirement is met on Windows, which uses the PE file format for EXE and DLL files. This requirement is not met on Linux, which uses ELF, nor is it currently met on Mac OS X, which uses Mach-O.

So why can't mixed mode assemblies be easily supported in Mono? Because ld.so doesn't like PE.

The only workarounds for this would be to either extend assemblies so that ELF files can contain both managed and unmanaged code, or to extend the shared library loader to support the loading of PE files. Using ELF as an assembly format may be useful, but would restrict portability of such ELF-assemblies to only Mono/Linux; .NET could never make use of them, nor could Mono on Mac OS X. Similarly, extending the shared library loader to support PE could be done, but can it support loading both PE and ELF (or Mach-O) binaries into a single process? What happens if a PE file loaded into an "ELF" process requires KERNEL32.DLL? Extending the shared library loader isn't a panacea either.

This limitation makes mixed mode assemblies of dubious value. It is likely solvable, but there are for more important things for Mono to focus on.

Posted on 27 Jan 2008 | Path: /development/mono/ | Permalink
blog comments powered by Disqus